| Author |
Message |
|
Bryan Smith
sage
Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2008 9:11 am Posts: 81 Location: Summerville, South Carolina, USA
|
 Surfboard Plans from old Magaines
|
| Wed Sep 24, 2008 5:01 pm |
|
 |
|
Roy Stewart
sage
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2006 1:29 am Posts: 3040
|
Cool, from the era of the classic tear drop longboard shape !
. .. . . before it was ruined by noseriding.

|
| Wed Sep 24, 2008 5:26 pm |
|
 |
|
Bryan Smith
sage
Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2008 9:11 am Posts: 81 Location: Summerville, South Carolina, USA
|
Here's another one from PM for a hollow paddleboard.
Looks allot like some of the modern stuff.
If I remember correctly, it seems like they left out a couple of measurements in the plans. I think it was the spacing of the ribs?
|
| Wed Sep 24, 2008 7:32 pm |
|
 |
|
Kiwijohn
sage
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2007 3:45 am Posts: 225
|
Very cool, it reminds me of a canoe my brother and I built with my father from a pop mechanics plan as a youngster, just about drowned the lot of us. All good fun.
Rgds
John
|
| Wed Sep 24, 2008 9:10 pm |
|
 |
|
spacesurfer
sage
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 4:14 pm Posts: 432 Location: Connecticut
|
Great stuff Bryan!
I have some plans that someone scanned and sent to me free from another site. They are two sets of plans: 1937 Popular Mechanics; and an improved version from Popular Science 1939. These are scans he made from the actual books. These plans are both by Tom Blake. The "Hollow Hawaiian
Surfboard".
If anyone is interested send me a pm and I can pass them along. They are huge files and not sure about the copyright issues as Bryan brings up. I can try and make into a .pdf if I get some time this week. Thanks for reminding me I had them Bryan.
Geoff
|
| Wed Sep 24, 2008 10:08 pm |
|
 |
|
Bryan Smith
sage
Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2008 9:11 am Posts: 81 Location: Summerville, South Carolina, USA
|
Here's an Australian variant of the Tom Blake Paddle board from around 1945.
I borrowed this one from the Pods for Primates Website.
http://www.surfresearch.com.au
Lots of good information hidden in this website.
|
| Thu Sep 25, 2008 7:25 am |
|
 |
|
Bryan Smith
sage
Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2008 9:11 am Posts: 81 Location: Summerville, South Carolina, USA
|
Last edited by Bryan Smith on Wed Oct 08, 2008 11:29 am, edited 1 time in total.
|
| Thu Sep 25, 2008 1:59 pm |
|
 |
|
Roy Stewart
sage
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2006 1:29 am Posts: 3040
|
Excellent stuff.
Those boards were surfboards by the way, not just paddleboards.
.
|
| Thu Sep 25, 2008 4:17 pm |
|
 |
|
Bryan Smith
sage
Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2008 9:11 am Posts: 81 Location: Summerville, South Carolina, USA
|
|
| Fri Sep 26, 2008 1:32 pm |
|
 |
|
Roy Stewart
sage
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2006 1:29 am Posts: 3040
|
Why keep calling it a paddleboard when Tom himself calls it a surfboard ?
To me it's an important point because I have discovered over the years that people think that any large wooden board with an extreme pintail is only a paddleboard, which is very sad as the extreme pintail is by far the best tail for big wooden surfboards.. .. .. . in fact the only way to get a very large wooden board to turn well is by using an extreme pintail in the planshape, it's even more important than rocker in big boards.
In very large boards the wide tailed Malibu or noserider shape becomes completely useless for surfing, and is only good for paddling, so people have it completely back to front.
Tom's pintail design is a great surfboard !
PS In the article by Frank Follmer and Tom Riley the pintailed board is described as a surfboard and the wide tailed board is described as a paddleboard, NOT the other way around.
.
.
|
| Fri Sep 26, 2008 5:26 pm |
|
|